This is the reason why Democracy the Americas Symposium www. This year,Democracy in the Americas DITAS will gather scientists, researchers, philosophers, scholars, dignitaries in government and academic experts in democracy to present research and facts on current data while introducing the latest trends in leadership, long term family equity, virtual education available to gain sustainability, social innovation, civic engagement, human rights, and long —lasting solutions to the problems facing countries struggling to uphold democracy. DITAS will supply an enriched knowledge environment where attendees will be able to learn how to advocate for and bring solutions to help disfranchised societies reach financial stability, economic independence and an overall healthy social and political environment based on the principles of justice and human rights. New generations have always been the spout of changes by demanding to have their voices heard and by challenging the old paradigms that are impacting their future.
Mormon Women for Ethical Government MWEG is a nonpartisan group dedicated to the ideals of honor, decency, accountability, transparency, and justice in governing. We are at once watchdogs and activists.
We are mothers, attorneys, historians, professors, marketing specialists, doctors, authors, chemists, political scientists, artists, data analysts, teachers, designers, managers, psychologists, singers, therapists, medical professionals, journalists, photographers, healthcare workers, physicists, and language translators, among other things.
We are women from all over the globe and all over the political spectrum, united in purpose and vision. How do I join? Can only women join? At MWEG, we draw on a long tradition of Mormon female activism hearkening back to our stalwart suffragist foremothers and believe there is tremendous power in sisterhood.
As one of our members put it, there is no stopping a group of mobilized Mormon women!
Can only Mormons join? You do have to be a woman, though. What are your guiding principles? We pledge to uphold all the core principles of peacemaking. We will not engage in name-calling, vitriol, or hate speech of any kind. We will seek to understand all sides of every issue before taking action.
Ethics, for example, refers to those standards that impose the reasonable obligations to refrain from rape, stealing, murder, assault, slander, and fraud.
Ethical standards also include those that enjoin virtues of honesty, compassion, and loyalty. And, ethical standards include standards relating to rights, such as the right to life, the right to freedom from injury, and the right to privacy.
Such standards are adequate standards of ethics because they are supported by consistent and well-founded reasons. If we are to be successful, we must be united. And we cannot be united unless we share the same vision.
And that vision includes an absolute commitment to civility and kindness in word and in deed and a pledge to live by the core Principles of Peacemaking, as laid out in our charter. We understand that not everyone in the world would agree that this is the best way to stand for truth and justice.
Some want to rant and rail and throw things. We acknowledge that we sometimes want to do that too. But we also acknowledge that as disciples of Jesus Christ, we have been called to a higher path.
And we are unwavering in our commitment to that path. What specific issues do you focus on? We have particular interest in defending and supporting the basic rights and dignity of our brothers and sisters throughout the world, whatever their race, gender, or religion.
We also seek to celebrate kindness, goodness, and justice wherever we see it.
And among the qualities we hope he or she would embody is simple civility. This would hopefully set a new tone for the country and could also improve relations between the President and the leader of the opposition, which has clearly lacked chemistry and any kind of a . One implication of this otherwise academic discussion is that natural rights and duties are in harmony, and deciding what justice requires in any particular case demands individual judgment. It is a profound miscarriage of justice to subsume individuals into a group when adjudicating individual claims of right. Civility does not appear among the moral virtues that Aristotle discusses in the Nicomachean Ethics. Beginning with courage and ending with the comprehensive political virtue of justice, Aristotle sets out the moral character that is desirable for political life.
We stand in defense of the fundamental values of our democracy and our Constitution. Are there any issues you do not discuss or engage with? After significant prayerful deliberation, as an organization we have specifically chosen not to engage with the issues of abortion and same-sex marriage.
While we acknowledge the strong emotional and moral pull both these issues provoke, this pull has been consistently manipulated by both major political parties to divide the electorate, create animosity among fellow citizens, and shield politicians from a focused analysis of their broader policy records.
By creating single-issue litmus tests, our political parties have excluded well-qualified and thoughtful individuals from participating in the political process, driven discussion away from the center, and avoided accountability for a wide range of complex policy issues before our nation.One implication of this otherwise academic discussion is that natural rights and duties are in harmony, and deciding what justice requires in any particular case demands individual judgment.
It is a profound miscarriage of justice to subsume individuals into a group when adjudicating individual claims of right. With our political system entrenching those in power, confrontation and noisy protest are among the few tools left to rebalance the system and recover our democracy, if only by a little.
As an activist for both civility and social justice, I empathize with many of the above “either/or” arguments. Civility is about more than just politeness, although politeness is a necessary first step. It is about disagreeing without disrespect, seeking common ground as a starting point for dialogue about differences, listening past one’s preconceptions, and teaching others to do the same.
The Mail Letters respond to Casey Cep’s examination of women’s anger, Adam Gopnik’s discussion of Frederick Douglass’s biography, and Daniel Mendelsohn’s essay about the Aeneid. So, you gave a speech praising former Justice Rehnquist dissent in Rhodes, there’s been much discussion about that, and you wrote, celebrating his success, that “success in stemming the free-wheeling tide creation of unenumerated rights,” that is what you said in celebration of Justice Rehnquist.
So “unenumerated rights” is a phrase. We value civility and kindness, humility and service, honor and respect, justice and peace. And these values — Democratic values, basic American values — define our vision of a positive politics in a strong democracy: where everyone is informed, everyone participates, and everyone benefits.